## Understanding Multiplicity: Holding Multiple Truths Simultaneously Simply put the concept of multiplicity is that many things can be true at once. This is a difficult concept for many. The [[Default setting]] of simplicity (only one thing can be true) is in direct conflict with multiplicity. To better understand multiplicity let's first explore simplicity and how it often acts as a barrier to embracing a more nuanced perspective. We will then delve deeper into how multiplicity can be applied to everyday situations, leading to a more comprehensive and compassionate understanding of the world around us. ### The Allure of Simplicity: A Single Truth Prevails The simplicity mindset is very easy to imagine through the words of a child. Children often operate within a framework where only one thing can be true at any given moment. This isn't necessarily a flaw, but rather a stage of development where the world is perceived in more concrete and less abstract terms. Let's imagine a child is hungry and [[Want]] to eat goldfish. In this situation the child is completely transfixed with one singular truth: they want to eat goldfish. In this moment, nothing else is true. They are going to have dinner soon. Doesn't matter. There isn't any goldfish in the house. Don't care. Other foods will satisfy their hunger. False. The can have an apple instead. Not true. The child's desire for goldfish eclipses all other considerations, demonstrating the power of a singular, unwavering focus. This is simplicity in action. The world is viewed through the narrow lens of immediate desire, and alternative possibilities are simply dismissed. ### Simplicity in Adulthood: The Pitfalls of Binary Thinking In an adult mind this may look like this. That person voted for the opposing political candidate and therefore they are a bad person. In this situation the adult is completely transfixed by this singular action and has determined that this other person is their enemy. They agree with the other person on most other political viewpoints. Doesn't matter. They were good friends and getting along well otherwise. False. This rigid adherence to a single data point, the political affiliation, overshadows all other aspects of their relationship and the other person's character. By viewing a large portion of their neighbor as enemies it causes undo stress. Worth it. This "us vs. them" mentality, fueled by simplicity, creates unnecessary division and prevents meaningful dialogue. It fosters a climate of animosity where common ground is ignored and differences are magnified. This can manifest in various ways, from online arguments to strained family relationships, all stemming from the inability to hold multiple truths simultaneously. Embracing multiplicity, on the other hand, allows for a more balanced and nuanced perspective, fostering understanding and empathy even in the face of disagreement.